not so w/Chrome.
A recent contest at CanSecWest, an event that brings together some of the most skilled experts in the security community, has demonstrated that the three most popular browser are susceptible to security bugs despite the vigilance and engineering prowess of their creators. Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer were all exploited during the Pwn2Own competition that took place at the conference. Google's Chrome browser, however, was the only one left standing—a victory that security researchers attribute to its innovative sandbox feature.
The contest awards security researchers with hardware and cash prizes for finding efficient ways to trick browsers into executing arbitrary code. During the first day of the competition, the contestants are required to do this in default browser installations without plugins such as Flash or Java, which are commonly used as vectors for attacks. Researchers typically prepare for the event far in advance by finding zero-day exploits ahead of time.
Early this month, prior champion Charlie Miller told reporters that he would be attempting to exploit a Safari vulnerability on Mac OS X. Safari, he said, would be the first to succumb to the contestants. As he promised, Safari went down first: he was able to execute his prepared hack in only a matter of seconds. Another security expert known only as Nils took longer, but was able to successfully exploit all three of the most popular browsers.




Gumby wrote:wow. five minutes into this and I can already tell I'm ditching explorer for chrome.
SD wrote:Scrap that. There isn't one. Thats a bit gay imho. Can't possibly survive without that. Back to FF.
Seriously, it's something I'm so used to using and would hugely miss so I'm not likely to stick with Chrome.

Gumby wrote:wow. five minutes into this and I can already tell I'm ditching explorer for chrome.
I have an older pc. it was hot when I first got it, but now not so much.
Its a P4 3.6GHZ (prescott series whatever that means) with HT. the task monitor shows 2 processors like the dual cores at my shop. the board is 800mhz i think and i have 4gb of 533mhz ram (although im told I can only use 3gb, and thats what xp reports anyway) It's five years old.
For those with newer pc's, you cant imagine what a drain it is to just view the home page of myspace or run the navigation apps on facebook. Or even load yahoo email with the bells and whistles on. painfully slow. and the longer you're on the slower it gets. My pc was mad in a time when sites like yahoo and the others weren't crammed with flash and java. Now a days I've started dreading going online.
With chrome it's practically an instant load. I almost can't believe the difference. and now i can finally take advantage of my high speed connection which up to now was only being utilized in quake and downloads.
And here's a cool plus: I had my explorer super customized to my work and personal needs with cool little toolbars and embedded sub-tool bars and chrome copied them perfectly and displays them for me as it did in ie. now theres no reason to ever go back
AG wrote:i'm more concerned about the potentially massive amount of statistics google is generating from chrome usage.
SD wrote:What's not usable about ff? I'm not pro ff or anything but I use it and don't really think theres much wrong with it. Keep in mind I don't tweak browsers or anything, I just want them to go to urls and ff does that for me
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest